The Debate on the Quantification of the Health Status of Public Fowls with Limiting Flies

June 1st, recently, many public places in China issued "Fly-Bill Orders" for public toilets. This has led to widespread discussions. Supporters believe that the establishment of benchmarks to guide the management of public toilets is a humanized management measure; while opponents point to "quantitative assessment." "There is no operability, and formalism is serious.

Launched more public toilets "Fly-flying orders"

On May 22nd, Beijing Municipal Commission of Municipal Administration issued the "Standard for Public Toilet Management Services in Major Industries in Beijing". The standard is clear, public toilet waste stagnation time does not exceed 30 minutes, and no more than two flies. In fact, Nanchang City in Jiangxi Province has similar management standards for public facilities such as public toilets. However, the number of flies allowed in public toilets is allowed to be one more than that in Beijing, ie “no more than 3 flies in public toilets”. All public toilets in Sanya, Hainan Province, implement the “Nine None” standard, which stipulates that management services must be “free of flies” and “fly-free”.

Coincidentally, Xi'an also has "no more than 3 flies in public toilets," but 90% of the citizens do not know this. Some cleaners even expressed their ignorance. The Nanjing Municipal Urban Management Bureau has also made requirements for public toilet hygiene, including the requirement for the number of flies, and no more than five in sight.

A series of public toilets "Fly-Bills" instantly detonated the enthusiasm of netizens. A Beijing flies on the Internet questioned that Nanchang flies had one more "compilation" section that was reprinted and commented on tens of thousands of times. Netizens laughed that Beijing's account was expensive. At the same time, it is more apt to call the Nanjing flies five, which is considered to be a happy fly in China.

Where did the number of fly counts for public toilets come from? According to textual research, as early as 1997, China issued the "Quality Standards for Urban Environmental Sanitation," which included the public health quality requirements, and put forward the prohibition criteria for the number of flies in public toilets: one, two and three types of toilet flies The numbers do not exceed 0, 3, and 5, respectively. Therefore, as long as the hygiene standards for public toilets in various cities are checked, the number of flies in public toilets can be calculated.

What is the regulation of the quantity of flies in public toilets or humane management?

The “Nanchang City Management Standard (Trial),” implemented in Nanchang last year, stipulated that there should be no more than three flies in public toilets in the strict control zone. The relevant person explained that the pilot standard was issued in the form of documents of the Nanchang Municipal People’s Government as Nanchang City. The basis for assessment of urban management work is certain and mandatory.

However, local reporters found that the standard was not strictly enforced and the number of flies in Nanchang's public toilets exceeded the standard. According to the person in charge of the Nanchang Municipal Urban Management Committee, the environmental sanitation status of public toilets in the city will be assessed every quarter. Generally, the number of flies will not be counted but the overall health status will be considered.

Most citizens in Xi'an believe that the “three fly counts in three types of public toilets” is a bit exaggerated. A citizen said that the original intention of flies to public toilets is good, but it does not take into account the difficulty of implementation. It is a bit "on paper". Moreover, the quality of public toilets is not determined by the number of flies.

“If it doesn’t really go to public toilets, what is the significance of such a mandatory requirement?” Netizens questioned accordingly that such regulations appear to be fine, but they are in fact not operational and formalism.

At the same time, there are also people who agree with similar regulations. Sanya, Hainan, stipulates that no fly can be found in public toilets. When a citizen interviewed, he said that although the regulations were a bit ridiculous, there were finally specific regulations that were an improvement in public toilets. The health situation will be improved accordingly.

Faced with various social arguments, the person in charge of the Sanitation Management Office of the Municipal Commission of Municipal Administration of the Municipal People's Republic of China also explained that the number of flies refers to the quantity within the visible range of public toilets. The reason why such a provision is made is to use quantitative measures to facilitate supervision. an examination. Beijing's standard for the management and service of public toilets is a job requirement, but it is not a mandatory standard. It is hoped that these public toilets will be guided to develop in a better direction.

"Fly-flying order" effectiveness geometry expert opinion presents polarization

Through the hustle and bustle of the surface, what are the core issues behind the "Flying Order"? In the final analysis, it is the balance between policy unity and implementation flexibility. In other words, how effective is quantitative management through indicators?

Some experts pointed out that these new standards and new measures are all reflections of respecting interest claims and pursuing social recognition. Further, the "two flies" standard also has a strong symbolic meaning, which implies the profound meaning of guiding public toilets through the establishment of benchmarks. The quantification of the standards for cleanliness of public toilets is actually refined and rigorous. It is more feasible to implement them. This provision is understandable in itself.

Some media commented that Beijing public toilets also have requirements such as “no more than 2 wastes, no more than 30 minutes of stagnation of waste” and other specific time and quantity restrictions. The public has focused its attention on "two flies". In fact, there is still an irrational emotion in it. For public toilets, such as the requirements for special toilet seats, as well as the sanitation and hygiene requirements are taken for granted. The number of flies is limited. Although there are funny and ridiculous elements in it, such standards do not need to be ironic. The public must not be caught in the muddy criticism.

Similarly, some experts believe that the “flies” standard that cannot be implemented is just a typical example of many “short” regulations, and the “Flying Limit Order” requirement is not very detailed, but it is difficult to implement because it is not practical. The Beijing standard management method reflects the false air and formalism hidden under the scientific goal management.

Professor Liang Zhongxiao of Shaanxi University of Technology said that the relationship between the toilet and the people is very close. From the point of view of the competent authorities, the original intention of the introduction of the provisions is worthy of recognition, but the specific standards should be based on reality, not too mechanical and quantitative. The two important criteria for the introduction of a standard are: scientific and reasonable, and operability. However, “no more than two or three flies in public toilets” are not operational in terms of implementation, statistics, and supervision, and they will inevitably become a piece of paper.

Based on this, some experts pointed out that the regulatory standards should be rather unduly rampant, and those that cannot be implemented must not be introduced. The introduction of public toilet management standards is indeed very necessary, but some terms are not as good as none. Because, if the regulatory standards themselves are not rigorous, the seriousness will naturally be reduced, which may lead to the implementation of the blur.

A small public toilet hygiene standard has also attracted the attention of foreign media. Radio Broadcasting Corporation of Canada (CBC), New Zealand Radio, and the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) have made reports. The BBC Beijing correspondent Michael Bristol even personally experienced a public toilet in Beijing. After experiencing the public toilets, Bristol believes that any progress will be helpful. He said that there are still many people in China who must use public toilets. The introduction of new standards is a step for China to try to improve public health and improve convenience, and it is worthy of recognition. (Finish)

Next:Installation, use and regulation of marine diesel generator sets
Previous post: 19-year-old boy imaginary 3 girls identity cheats play with kidney-for-money exchange